Do you believe there should be more development within Kananaskis Country?
Date: 2003-10-01
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: develop trails that are compatible with the lifestyle of the bear.
Date: 2003-10-01
Yes or No? No
Comments: I think KC is better left all natural.
Date: 2003-10-01
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: because
Date: 2003-01-19
Yes or No? No
Comments: There is already enough encroachment on Bear habitat
Date: 2003-01-17
Yes or No? No
Comments: poo head
Date: 2003-01-15
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: Come on lick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 2003-01-14
Yes or No? No
Comments: no, let the animals take care of themselves.
Date: 2002-12-12
Yes or No? No
Comments: Please keep K-Country natural. I want to be able to share it with my kids in its current natural, beautiful condition. Please don't build any more roads or allow any form of logging, mining, or tourism-oriented development. I love hiking up a creek that has no bridges to find a virtually untouched pristine lake at the head of the valley. These places are too rare already.
Date: 2002-12-09
Yes or No? No
Comments: dont know where that is
Date: 2002-12-03
Yes or No? No
Comments: I don't know enough about the area to give an answer.
Date: 2002-11-22
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: the bears dont deserve the land
Date: 2002-11-20
Yes or No? No
Comments: no
Date: 2002-11-17
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: fnghhgh
Date: 2002-11-13
Yes or No? No
Comments: There already is enough!
Date: 2002-11-12
Yes or No? No
Comments: Once it is established that an animal species (grizzly) is in danger, there should be an immediate cesation to development. Obviously, the government has no projected plans to handle a human population of 900 trillion people. When humans lose the wildlife they live amongst, they have committed the most heinous crime in the Universe. Each one of us is an environmental Hitler. This must stop immediately !!!
Date: 2002-11-04
Yes or No? No
Comments: I personally would like to see less development everywhere in the US. However I beleive it is inevitable and private citizens as well as governments should buy land in order to save it
Date: 2002-10-28
Yes or No? No
Comments: I really don't know, I haven't a clue where this county is.
Date: 2002-10-18
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: I don't know
Date: 2002-10-15
Yes or No? No
Comments: Because animals should have a place to live ...if they have their own place they wont come as often
Date: 2002-10-10
Yes or No? No
Comments: i dont no wut it is
Date: 2002-10-04
Yes or No? No
Comments: where there are people there are problems.
Date: 2002-09-27
Yes or No? No
Comments: gjkfdjklfjglkjglkdjglkjflkgjdljgkfljgldf
Date: 2002-09-25
Yes or No? No
Comments: There is already too much development. I am appalled that all terrain vehicles, etc are allowed to utilize so much land and prime bear habitat included. Poor management in my opinion.
Date: 2002-09-18
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: So we can have more bears and camping areas that arent urbanized
Date: 2002-09-16
Yes or No? Yes
Comments: as long as it is not detrimental to the wildlife